Open Company Data in Georgia: Official Sources, APIs and Reuse Rights

Georgia has a serious official company-data ecosystem, but it should not be reduced to a simple list of companies. The right way to evaluate Georgia is to start with the official register, then add open-data, statistics, procurement, intellectual-property and regulator layers.

The strongest route is the National Agency of Public Registry business registry and public registry search, with NAPR fee/statistics pages, Geostat, procurement.gov.ge, Revenue Service, Sakpatenti, National Bank of Georgia, Reportal/SARAS and Matsne legal-publication sources as separate official layers. That makes Georgia a strong official registry and procurement source guide with document-fee, public-statement, language and privacy caveats, but it does not remove the usual reuse checks: dataset terms, attribution, no-endorsement language, privacy, marketing-law boundaries and source freshness.

This guide maps the main official sources for company data in Georgia, explains what each source can and cannot do, and shows where a normalized CompaniesData-style dataset adds value.

The deeper question is not whether a source exists. The useful question is which source can be trusted for identity, which one proves events or filings, which one is usable at scale, which one is only a manual service, and which fields become legally sensitive once the data is reused commercially.

Quick Answer

Georgia is publishable as a strong official-source guide because NAPR is the central registry authority, the public registry search route is stable, Geostat publishes business-register statistics, procurement.gov.ge gives public-procurement context, and tax, IP, financial-regulator, reporting and legal-publication layers add useful enrichment. The article should not claim unrestricted free bulk registry reuse. The safe claim is that Georgia has strong official verification and enrichment routes, while NAPR extracts, scanned documents, representative fields, email/phone fields and procurement data must be handled with source-specific terms and privacy boundaries.

For practical work, the most useful source stack is: NAPR Business Registry, NAPR public registry search, Geostat business register, Georgia procurement portal, Revenue Service Georgia, Sakpatenti.

The safe editorial answer is this: Georgia has strong public and official business-data sources, but public data is not automatically bulk-downloadable, marketing-ready or free of personal-data constraints.

A serious Georgia dataset normally needs at least four layers: the legal register for entity identity, official publications or filings for change events, public procurement/regulator/IP/statistical sources for enrichment, and a separate compliance layer for privacy, contact-data use, suppression and lawful outreach.

Key Takeaways

• Best starting point: the National Agency of Public Registry business registry and public registry search, with NAPR fee/statistics pages, Geostat, procurement.gov.ge, Revenue Service, Sakpatenti, National Bank of Georgia, Reportal/SARAS and Matsne legal-publication sources as separate official layers.
• Core source stack: NAPR Business Registry, NAPR public registry search, Geostat business register, Georgia procurement portal, Revenue Service Georgia, Sakpatenti.
• Reuse rule: public visibility is not the same as bulk reuse, resale permission or marketing-contact permission.
• Buyer value: the useful dataset is the normalized, deduplicated and source-auditable version, not a raw list of portal links.
• Commercial separation: official company records, enriched company profiles and business contact data should remain separate layers with separate compliance notes.

Editorial Methodology

This article uses an official-source-first method. Sources are included when they help verify legal existence, public filings, procurement activity, taxpayer or identifier context, IP ownership, regulated status, statistics or lawful compliance context. Commercial providers and contact-data products are not used as authority for official reuse rights.

• Prefer the national registry, company house, gazette or official business-registration authority before any secondary source.
• Classify access as search, API, bulk download, paid extract, subscription, document workflow, data catalogue or unclear/manual access.
• Separate legal-entity data from establishment statistics, procurement suppliers, listed-company disclosures, tax identifiers and private contact data.
• Treat beneficial owners, officers, addresses, signatures, insolvency notices and sole-trader records as privacy-sensitive unless the source and law clearly support reuse.
• Hold or omit unstable source links when live QA shows 403, 429, 5xx, DNS, TLS or timeout behaviour that would create broken-link noise.

What Counts as Company Data in Georgia?

In Georgia, these layers should not be collapsed into one undifferentiated database. A registry result may prove legal existence, a procurement notice may prove public-sector activity, an IP record may prove brand or invention ownership, and a regulator list may prove supervision. Those are different facts with different update cycles, identifiers and reuse boundaries.

Reuse Rights and Compliance

Across jurisdictions, public-sector-information and open-data policies can support reuse of public-sector data, and high-value dataset rules increasingly treat company and company-ownership data as important public information. In practice, Georgia's actual reuse position still depends on each source, endpoint, licence and access method.

• Cite official sources and preserve update dates where the source provides them.
• Do not imply that a derived dataset is endorsed by the registry or public authority.
• Do not mix public register data with marketing-contact permission.
• Check whether API, bulk download, paid extract and web-search access have different terms.
• Treat officers, beneficial owners and natural-person data as GDPR-sensitive where applicable.

publishable as a strong official-source map with held soft links, NAPR document-fee/privacy caveats and procurement/reporting enrichment

Coverage, Access and Update Risk

The most common mistake in Georgia company-data work is to confuse visibility with completeness. A public search screen can be authoritative for one entity lookup without being suitable for bulk ingestion. A downloadable dataset can be reusable for a defined snapshot while still excluding filings, documents, directors, inactive entities or historical changes.

• Coverage: identify whether the source covers companies, business names, branches, non-profits, sole traders, listed issuers, regulated entities or only a sector subset.
• Freshness: preserve the source update date and avoid mixing live portal results with old downloaded files without version labels.
• Identifiers: map registration numbers, tax identifiers, procurement supplier IDs, LEI records and exchange tickers as separate keys until verified.
• Language and formats: normalize local-language names, legal forms, transliteration, accents, abbreviations and address formats carefully.
• Operational access: document whether the workflow is public search, API, bulk file, paid extract, login-only service, PDF, CKAN/OData/SPARQL or manual request.

Reuse Checklist for Georgia

Controlled Access, Document Fees and Privacy Clearance

Georgia passes the publication bar only after holding the unstable open-data/API links from the public article. NAPR, Geostat, procurement.gov.ge, Revenue Service, Sakpatenti, NBG, Reportal/SARAS and Matsne provide enough official-source evidence for a deep guide, but registry extracts, scanned documents, representatives, addresses, phone numbers and email fields still need privacy and reuse boundaries.

Claims allowed in this article

• NAPR is the central official business registry authority for entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurial legal entities in Georgia.
• The public registry search route can support entity verification, while extracts and scanned documents may involve fees or personal-data exposure.
• Georgia has unusually strong procurement open-data evidence through the State Procurement Agency OCDS publication policy.

Claims blocked from this article

• Do not claim all NAPR registry documents are free or unrestricted bulk data.
• Do not treat public registry e-mails, representatives or scanned documents as sales-contact permission.
• Do not use the United States state of Georgia business registry by mistake.

Held source-risk findings

• Georgia OCDS procurement API policy: odapi.spa.ge – held from public article because live QA returned TLS/connection warnings from this node.
• Georgia data portal: data.gov.ge – held from public article because live QA returned TLS/connection warnings from this node.

The held sources may still be useful in a private research note or manual browser review. They are excluded from the public source matrix to avoid broken-link noise and unsupported API/bulk claims.

Resource Pack

Use this resource pack as a working map for verification, ingestion planning and source-risk review. The small source logos are decorative credibility cues only; the authority still comes from the official URL, owner, access model and reuse note.

Main Official Sources: Deep Dive

1. NAPR Business Registry

Owner: official registry. Access: https://napr.gov.ge/en/service/registers/business-registry.

• What it gives: Core legal-entity verification route.
• Reuse value: NAPR terms; paid extracts/documents may apply
• Main limitation: Not proof of complete free official bulk reuse.

NAPR Business Registry is a official registry source for Georgia. Its main practical value is Core legal-entity verification route. Access is through https://napr.gov.ge/en/service/registers/business-registry, so the source should be treated according to that access model rather than assumed to be an unrestricted bulk feed.

For reuse, the working rule is: NAPR terms; paid extracts/documents may apply. The main limitation is Not proof of complete free official bulk reuse. In a normalized company-data workflow this source should be captured with provenance, retrieval date, field-level caveats and a clear distinction between legal-entity facts, compliance signals and any later marketing/contact enrichment.

2. NAPR public registry search

Owner: official registry. Access: https://enreg.reestri.gov.ge/main.php?m=new_index.

• What it gives: Entity lookup and registry statement route.
• Reuse value: NAPR public-register terms
• Main limitation: Georgian-language data and document/privacy cautions may apply.

NAPR public registry search is a official registry source for Georgia. Its main practical value is Entity lookup and registry statement route. Access is through https://enreg.reestri.gov.ge/main.php?m=new_index, so the source should be treated according to that access model rather than assumed to be an unrestricted bulk feed.

For reuse, the working rule is: NAPR public-register terms. The main limitation is Georgian-language data and document/privacy cautions may apply. In a normalized company-data workflow this source should be captured with provenance, retrieval date, field-level caveats and a clear distinction between legal-entity facts, compliance signals and any later marketing/contact enrichment.

3. Geostat business register

Owner: official statistics. Access: https://www.geostat.ge/en/modules/categories/64/business-register.

• What it gives: Business demography and activity/region/size context.
• Reuse value: Geostat terms and statistical reuse rules
• Main limitation: Aggregate statistics, not company-level registry data.

Geostat business register is a official statistics source for Georgia. Its main practical value is Business demography and activity/region/size context. Access is through https://www.geostat.ge/en/modules/categories/64/business-register, so the source should be treated according to that access model rather than assumed to be an unrestricted bulk feed.

For reuse, the working rule is: Geostat terms and statistical reuse rules. The main limitation is Aggregate statistics, not company-level registry data. In a normalized company-data workflow this source should be captured with provenance, retrieval date, field-level caveats and a clear distinction between legal-entity facts, compliance signals and any later marketing/contact enrichment.

4. Georgia procurement portal

Owner: official procurement. Access: https://tenders.procurement.gov.ge/public/.

• What it gives: Tender and supplier context.
• Reuse value: State Procurement Agency terms
• Main limitation: Procurement subset only.

Georgia procurement portal is a official procurement source for Georgia. Its main practical value is Tender and supplier context. Access is through https://tenders.procurement.gov.ge/public/, so the source should be treated according to that access model rather than assumed to be an unrestricted bulk feed.

For reuse, the working rule is: State Procurement Agency terms. The main limitation is Procurement subset only. In a normalized company-data workflow this source should be captured with provenance, retrieval date, field-level caveats and a clear distinction between legal-entity facts, compliance signals and any later marketing/contact enrichment.

5. Revenue Service Georgia

Owner: official tax authority. Access: https://www.rs.ge/.

• What it gives: Tax/VAT and service context.
• Reuse value: Revenue Service terms
• Main limitation: Tax portal, not company master data.

Revenue Service Georgia is a official tax authority source for Georgia. Its main practical value is Tax/VAT and service context. Access is through https://www.rs.ge/, so the source should be treated according to that access model rather than assumed to be an unrestricted bulk feed.

For reuse, the working rule is: Revenue Service terms. The main limitation is Tax portal, not company master data. In a normalized company-data workflow this source should be captured with provenance, retrieval date, field-level caveats and a clear distinction between legal-entity facts, compliance signals and any later marketing/contact enrichment.

6. Sakpatenti

Owner: official IP authority. Access: https://www.sakpatenti.gov.ge/en/.

• What it gives: IP owner and brand enrichment.
• Reuse value: Sakpatenti terms
• Main limitation: IP layer only.

Sakpatenti is a official IP authority source for Georgia. Its main practical value is IP owner and brand enrichment. Access is through https://www.sakpatenti.gov.ge/en/, so the source should be treated according to that access model rather than assumed to be an unrestricted bulk feed.

For reuse, the working rule is: Sakpatenti terms. The main limitation is IP layer only. In a normalized company-data workflow this source should be captured with provenance, retrieval date, field-level caveats and a clear distinction between legal-entity facts, compliance signals and any later marketing/contact enrichment.

7. National Bank of Georgia

Owner: official regulator. Access: https://nbg.gov.ge/en.

• What it gives: Financial-sector regulated entities and context.
• Reuse value: NBG terms
• Main limitation: Sector-specific.

National Bank of Georgia is a official regulator source for Georgia. Its main practical value is Financial-sector regulated entities and context. Access is through https://nbg.gov.ge/en, so the source should be treated according to that access model rather than assumed to be an unrestricted bulk feed.

For reuse, the working rule is: NBG terms. The main limitation is Sector-specific. In a normalized company-data workflow this source should be captured with provenance, retrieval date, field-level caveats and a clear distinction between legal-entity facts, compliance signals and any later marketing/contact enrichment.

8. NAPR business registration FAQ

Owner: official registry. Access: https://www.napr.gov.ge/en/page/frequently-asked-questions/business-registration-faq.

• What it gives: Explains registry extracts, legal forms and registration context.
• Reuse value: NAPR terms
• Main limitation: Guidance layer, not bulk data.

NAPR business registration FAQ is a official registry source for Georgia. Its main practical value is Explains registry extracts, legal forms and registration context. Access is through https://www.napr.gov.ge/en/page/frequently-asked-questions/business-registration-faq, so the source should be treated according to that access model rather than assumed to be an unrestricted bulk feed.

For reuse, the working rule is: NAPR terms. The main limitation is Guidance layer, not bulk data. In a normalized company-data workflow this source should be captured with provenance, retrieval date, field-level caveats and a clear distinction between legal-entity facts, compliance signals and any later marketing/contact enrichment.

9. NAPR business registration fees and terms

Owner: official registry. Access: https://www.napr.gov.ge/en/page/fees-and-terms/business-registration-fee.

• What it gives: Documents registration and extract fees, including English-language extract boundaries.
• Reuse value: NAPR terms; paid extracts/documents may apply
• Main limitation: Fee schedule, not a company dataset.

NAPR business registration fees and terms is a official registry source for Georgia. Its main practical value is Documents registration and extract fees, including English-language extract boundaries. Access is through https://www.napr.gov.ge/en/page/fees-and-terms/business-registration-fee, so the source should be treated according to that access model rather than assumed to be an unrestricted bulk feed.

For reuse, the working rule is: NAPR terms; paid extracts/documents may apply. The main limitation is Fee schedule, not a company dataset. In a normalized company-data workflow this source should be captured with provenance, retrieval date, field-level caveats and a clear distinction between legal-entity facts, compliance signals and any later marketing/contact enrichment.

10. NAPR statistics

Owner: official registry. Access: https://www.napr.gov.ge/en/statistic.

• What it gives: Business Registry statistics and registered-entity trend context.
• Reuse value: NAPR terms
• Main limitation: Aggregate statistics, not entity-level data.

NAPR statistics is a official registry source for Georgia. Its main practical value is Business Registry statistics and registered-entity trend context. Access is through https://www.napr.gov.ge/en/statistic, so the source should be treated according to that access model rather than assumed to be an unrestricted bulk feed.

For reuse, the working rule is: NAPR terms. The main limitation is Aggregate statistics, not entity-level data. In a normalized company-data workflow this source should be captured with provenance, retrieval date, field-level caveats and a clear distinction between legal-entity facts, compliance signals and any later marketing/contact enrichment.

How to Build a Georgia Company Dataset

A practical Georgia dataset should use NAPR as the legal-identity anchor and avoid treating every public field as reusable contact data. The strongest workflow is evidence-led and keeps registry, tax, procurement, reporting, IP, regulator and legal-framework facts in separate tables.

1. Registry seed: start with NAPR business registry and public registry search to identify the entity, status, legal form and available public statements.
2. Document and fee boundary: use NAPR FAQ and fee pages to document extracts, English extracts, document copies and paid workflows.
3. Statistics benchmark: use NAPR statistics and Geostat business-register statistics to validate market-size assumptions without treating aggregates as company records.
4. Procurement enrichment: use procurement.gov.ge and the public tenders portal for supplier and contracting context; hold the OCDS API-policy URL until TLS is clean.
5. Official enrichment: add Revenue Service, Sakpatenti, National Bank of Georgia, Reportal/SARAS and Matsne facts only where their source scope supports the field.
6. Commercial delivery: keep emails, phones, contact roles and outreach segmentation in a separate lawful-basis workflow.

Practical Options

Official open-data or API route

Start with NAPR's business registry and public registry search for entity verification. Use NAPR FAQ, fees and statistics pages to explain coverage, extracts, registration events and paid-document boundaries. Add Geostat for aggregate business-register statistics, procurement.gov.ge for supplier/tender context, Revenue Service for tax service context, Sakpatenti for IP, the National Bank of Georgia for regulated financial-sector entities, Reportal/SARAS for financial-reporting context and Matsne for the legal framework.

For production use, treat this route as an ingestion plan rather than a single download. Start with the official registry or data catalogue, keep raw source snapshots, record access terms, then add enrichment sources one by one with field-level provenance.

Manual verification and document route

Some countries expose important company facts through certificates, PDF filings, gazette notices, paid extracts or login-based services. Those sources can be valuable, but they should be documented as controlled workflows. Do not describe them as open APIs or bulk datasets unless the authority clearly publishes that access model.

Contact-data and marketing-list route

For sales outreach, company identity data is only the first layer. Business emails, phone numbers, contact roles, suppression logic and segmentation require a separate compliant contact-data process. That layer should be documented separately from official registry reuse.

Private reports and risk products

Private company-report providers can be useful for manual due diligence in Georgia, but the editorial focus here is not a directory of competitors. The strategic value is understanding which official sources exist and where normalization is required.

If a user needs CRM-ready company records, the practical path is to combine official-source provenance with enrichment, deduplication, quality checks and lawful delivery controls. That is different from buying a generic lead list: the official-source layer explains what can be verified, while the commercial dataset layer explains how the records can be used operationally.

What Is Missing from Official Open Data?

• Do not claim that all NAPR extracts, scanned documents or registry statements are free or unrestricted bulk data.
• The previously mapped odapi.spa.ge procurement API policy and data.gov.ge portal are held from the public article because this node returned TLS/connection warnings.
• NAPR public registry records can include representatives, addresses, documents, phone or email fields; those are verification facts, not sales-contact permission.
• Geostat statistics are aggregate business-demography data, not company-level registry records.
• Procurement, tax, IP, financial-regulator, reporting and legal-publication sources are enrichment layers, not replacements for the NAPR registry.
• Georgian-language names, English extracts, transliteration and legal-form variants require careful normalization.
• A commercial dataset must separate legal identity, official-source enrichment and contact-data fields with different compliance notes.

This is why company-data products often add value even when the underlying public sources are strong: official data is frequently split across authorities, formats, languages, identifiers and access models.

Missing data should be treated explicitly in the dataset design. If an official source lacks bulk downloads, CompaniesData should not pretend that the bulk file exists; it should record the source limitation, add alternate official enrichment where lawful, and expose confidence fields so users know which attributes came from which layer.

Recommended Data Model

A practical CompaniesData-style model for Georgia should keep source evidence and commercial-use fields separate. The core table should hold legal entity identity, status, registration identifiers, legal form, jurisdiction, registered address and source dates. Separate enrichment tables can then store procurement awards, IP assets, regulator status, listed-company signals, LEI matches, sanctions/compliance hits and statistics-sector context.

• Entity identity: legal name, normalized name, registration number, jurisdiction, legal form and lifecycle status.
• Source provenance: source URL, authority, retrieval date, access method, licence/reuse note and confidence flag.
• Event history: incorporation, amendments, filings, gazette notices, insolvency or dissolution where legally public.
• Enrichment: procurement, IP, regulator, exchange, LEI and official statistics layers with their own source dates.
• Commercial delivery: CRM-ready exports, segmentation and contact-data fields only when a separate lawful basis and suppression workflow exist.

How CompaniesData Adds Value

For Georgia, CompaniesData's role is to turn fragmented source material into a usable business dataset: normalized company names, deduplicated entities, consistent country and activity fields, source provenance, update tracking and enrichment hooks.

• Normalize register identifiers and legal names.
• Match official company records with procurement, IP, LEI and regulator signals.
• Flag source provenance so every derived profile can be audited.
• Separate company identity from contact-data and marketing-permission layers.
• Package data for analysis, CRM enrichment and market research instead of forcing users to parse portals manually.

For Georgia, the editorial value of CompaniesData is not claiming that every record is open or that every field can be reused without conditions. The value is the opposite: making source boundaries visible, normalizing messy records, adding explainable enrichment and delivering a dataset that users can audit instead of a black-box scrape.

Request a CompaniesData sample for Georgia if you need a practical dataset rather than a list of source portals.

Commercial Dataset and Contact-Data Boundary

The Georgia open-data guide supports CompaniesData’s company-database work, but official registry visibility is not marketing permission. NAPR records, extracts, public statements, procurement supplier data, IP ownership, regulator context and reporting records can verify company facts. They do not automatically provide a lawful basis for cold email, phone outreach or lead-list resale.

• Company identity layer: legal name, registration number, status, legal form, registry source and source date.
• Document layer: extracts, public statements, scanned documents and legal-publication references with fee and privacy notes.
• Enrichment layer: tax, procurement, IP, regulator, reporting and statistics context with separate source provenance.
• Contact-data layer: business emails, phones, contacts, suppression and outreach segmentation require a separate lawful workflow through CompaniesData.cloud.
• Spanish-speaking buyers: Hispanic contact-data demand should be routed to CentraldeComunicacion.es instead of third-party contact-data competitors.

Source Matrix

Source	Owner	What it gives	Reuse value	Limitations
NAPR Business Registry	official registry	Core legal-entity verification route.	NAPR terms; paid extracts/documents may apply	Not proof of complete free official bulk reuse.
NAPR public registry search	official registry	Entity lookup and registry statement route.	NAPR public-register terms	Georgian-language data and document/privacy cautions may apply.
Geostat business register	official statistics	Business demography and activity/region/size context.	Geostat terms and statistical reuse rules	Aggregate statistics, not company-level registry data.
Georgia procurement portal	official procurement	Tender and supplier context.	State Procurement Agency terms	Procurement subset only.
Revenue Service Georgia	official tax authority	Tax/VAT and service context.	Revenue Service terms	Tax portal, not company master data.
Sakpatenti	official IP authority	IP owner and brand enrichment.	Sakpatenti terms	IP layer only.
National Bank of Georgia	official regulator	Financial-sector regulated entities and context.	NBG terms	Sector-specific.
NAPR business registration FAQ	official registry	Explains registry extracts, legal forms and registration context.	NAPR terms	Guidance layer, not bulk data.
NAPR business registration fees and terms	official registry	Documents registration and extract fees, including English-language extract boundaries.	NAPR terms; paid extracts/documents may apply	Fee schedule, not a company dataset.
NAPR statistics	official registry	Business Registry statistics and registered-entity trend context.	NAPR terms	Aggregate statistics, not entity-level data.
State Procurement Agency website	official procurement	Procurement authority context for tenders and suppliers.	State Procurement Agency terms	Procurement layer only; API policy URL held due TLS warning.
Reportal Georgia	official reporting portal	Financial-reporting and accountable-entity context.	Reportal/SARAS terms	Reporting subset, not the full company register.
SARAS Georgia	official regulator	Accounting, reporting and audit supervision context.	SARAS terms	Regulatory/reporting layer only.
Matsne Law of Georgia on Entrepreneurs	official legal publication	Legal basis for entrepreneur registration and company forms.	Matsne terms	Legal framework, not a search source.
Matsne Law of Georgia on Public Registry	official legal publication	Legal framework for the Registry of Entrepreneurs and related extracts.	Matsne terms	Legal framework, not an entity-level dataset.

Georgia has a strong central business registry through NAPR, an English public registry route, official business-register statistics, OCDS procurement evidence and useful tax, IP and central-bank layers. It is one of the strongest new Wave 23 candidates for a deep article.

FAQ

Is there a single free official bulk company database for Georgia?

Not always. Georgia has official company-data sources, but bulk access, API access, paid extracts and web search can be separate products. Do not assume a complete free bulk file unless the specific source proves it.

What is the best first source for Georgia company data?

The best first source is the National Agency of Public Registry business registry and public registry search, with NAPR fee/statistics pages, Geostat, procurement.gov.ge, Revenue Service, Sakpatenti, National Bank of Georgia, Reportal/SARAS and Matsne legal-publication sources as separate official layers. It should then be combined with statistics, procurement, IP and regulator sources.

Can public company data be reused commercially?

Often yes, but only under the conditions of the specific source. Attribution, update-date preservation, no-endorsement wording and GDPR controls may apply.

Can I use registry data for cold email marketing?

No automatic conclusion follows from public registry access. Marketing requires a separate lawful basis, suppression handling and contact-data compliance review.

Why use CompaniesData instead of manually collecting Georgia sources?

Manual collection is slow because identifiers, formats, languages and coverage differ by source. CompaniesData adds normalization, matching, deduplication, provenance and practical delivery formats.

How often should Georgia company data be refreshed?

Refresh cadence depends on the source. Registry searches and APIs can support frequent checks, while gazettes, procurement portals, statistical releases and paid extracts may update on different schedules. A reliable dataset should store retrieval dates and source-specific update notes.

What should be audited before publishing or selling an enriched dataset?

Audit source authority, licence terms, personal-data exposure, contact-data lawful basis, field provenance, suppression rules, update dates and whether any official source prohibits automated reuse or resale.

Sources

• NAPR Business Registry – official registry
• NAPR public registry search – official registry
• Geostat business register – official statistics
• Georgia procurement portal – official procurement
• Revenue Service Georgia – official tax authority
• Sakpatenti – official IP authority
• National Bank of Georgia – official regulator
• NAPR business registration FAQ – official registry
• NAPR business registration fees and terms – official registry
• NAPR statistics – official registry
• State Procurement Agency website – official procurement
• Reportal Georgia – official reporting portal
• SARAS Georgia – official regulator
• Matsne Law of Georgia on Entrepreneurs – official legal publication
• Matsne Law of Georgia on Public Registry – official legal publication